Powered-air welding respirators: proving they’re compliant, not just buying them
Posted on 9th Jun 2026
Posted on 26th Feb 2021
Stiftung Warentest, a German consumer organisation and foundation involved in investigating and comparing goods and services in an unbiased way, has examined ten FFP2 masks from different manufactures. Think of Stiftung Warentest as the German version of Which?.
However, not all models provided equally good protection: Many of them when tested were not close enough to the face and unfortunately let aerosols through. With three masks, the testers complained about the low breathing comfort, which makes it relatively difficult to breathe – dm Mivolis, Hygisun and Rossmann Altapharma.
Both men and women from a fire department were the candidates to check the fit of the masks. Each model was worn by ten of the subjects. It was made sure that different face types were represented in each group of test persons and that the mask fitted correctly for each of them.
The full test details are available here – https://www.test.de/Masken-Welcher-Mund-Nasen-Sch…
The issues with using a sub-optimal FFP2 mask is that if a FFP2 mask does not fit optimally, it may not protect better than a medical mask or a cloth mask
The test winner and only suitable mask tested, was the 3M Aura 9320+ mask. It fits well on a wide range of faces, is tight and enables very comfortable breathing. The FFP2 mask from 3M is the only respirator in the test to meet the most important test criteria without restriction.
If you would like to purchase this mask, you can do so here
3M Protects the Best….Tried and Tested.
Posted on 9th Jun 2026