Understanding 3M Aura Masks: FFP2 vs. FFP3 Explained
Posted on 5th Jan 2025
Ultimate 3M AURA Mask Comparison: 1863+, 9330+, 9320+, 1862+
When it comes to choosing the right mask for protection against airborne particles and viruses, understanding the differences between various options is crucial. If you’re clinically vulnerable or looking for the best mask for your needs, the 3M Aura range offers a variety of high-performance options. In this guide, we’ll break down the differences between four popular masks: the 3M Aura 1863+, 9330+, 9320+, and 1862+. This article is tailored for UK customers and will help you make an informed decision.
What Do FFP2 and FFP3 Mean?
In the UK and EU, masks are classified using the FFP (Filtering Face Piece) standard:
- FFP2: Equivalent to the N95 standard in the US, FFP2 masks filter at least 94% of airborne particles. They are suitable for general-purpose use, including protection against COVID-19 and other airborne contaminants.
- FFP3: Equivalent to N99 in the US, FFP3 masks offer the highest level of protection, filtering at least 99% of airborne particles. These masks are ideal for higher-risk environments.
Comparison of 3M Aura Masks
1. 3M Aura 1863+ FFP3 Type IIR Unvalved Respirator
- Filtration Efficiency: Offers 99%+ filtration, providing the highest level of protection.
- Fluid Resistance: Certified as Type IIR, meaning it resists fluids like blood and bodily fluids. Ideal for clinical settings.
- Best For: Clinically vulnerable individuals, healthcare professionals, or anyone in a high-risk environment.
- Key Benefit: Combines FFP3 protection with fluid resistance.
- Size and Fit: The surgical 1863+ FFP3 is larger than the industrial 9330+ FFP3 due to different placement of the ultrasonic welding and filter material, making it more breathable.
2. 3M Aura 9330+ FFP3 Unvalved Respirator
- Filtration Efficiency: Same as the 1863+ (99%+ filtration) but without the fluid-resistant Type IIR rating.
- Fluid Resistance: Not fluid-resistant, making it more suitable for general environments where splashes are not a concern.
- Best For: High-level protection in non-clinical settings, such as crowded public spaces.
- Key Benefit: Lightweight and comfortable for extended wear.
- Size and Fit: The 9330+ is smaller and fits tighter than the 1863+ due to the placement of ultrasonic welding near the staples. The filter material is also thicker on the 9330+ compared to the 1863+.
3. 3M Aura 9320+ FFP2 Respirator
- Filtration Efficiency: Filters 94% of airborne particles, offering moderate protection.
- Fluid Resistance: Not fluid-resistant.
- Best For: Everyday use in low-to-moderate risk environments where fluid resistance isn’t required.
- Key Benefit: Affordable and effective for general protection.
- Size and Fit: The industrial 9320+ is smaller than the surgical 1862+ due to differences in ultrasonic welding placement and filter material.
4. 3M Aura 1862+ FFP2 Type IIR Unvalved Respirator
- Filtration Efficiency: Same as the 9320+ (94% filtration) but with added fluid resistance (Type IIR).
- Fluid Resistance: Certified as Type IIR, offering protection against splashes and fluids.
- Best For: Clinical settings or environments where fluid resistance is a priority.
- Key Benefit: Combines FFP2 filtration with fluid-resistant protection.
- Size and Fit: Slightly larger than the industrial 9320+ due to different ultrasonic welding placement and more breathable filter material.
Which Mask Should You Choose?
Your choice depends on your specific needs:
- For Maximum Protection: Choose the 3M Aura 1863+ or 9330+ if you need FFP3-level filtration. If you’re in a clinical setting, the 1863+ is ideal due to its fluid resistance.
- For Moderate Protection: The 3M Aura 9320+ and 1862+ are great FFP2 options. Opt for the 1862+ if fluid resistance is necessary.
- For Clinically Vulnerable Individuals: The 3M Aura 1863+ provides the highest level of protection and fluid resistance, making it the best choice.
Understanding Price Differences:
The variation in pricing among these masks reflects differences in their features and intended uses:
| Feature | 3M Aura 1863+ | 3M Aura 9330+ | 3M Aura 9320+ | 3M Aura 1862+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filtration Efficiency | 99%+ (FFP3) | 99%+ (FFP3) | 94% (FFP2) | 94% (FFP2) |
| Fluid Resistance | Yes (Type IIR) | No | No | Yes (Type IIR) |
| Intended Use | Clinical | Industrial | General | Clinical |
| Breathability | High | Moderate | High | High |
| Size and Fit | Larger | Smaller | Smaller | Larger |
| Filter Thickness | Moderate | Thicker | Moderate | Moderate |
- Fluid Resistance: Masks with Type IIR certification, like the 1863+ and 1862+, are priced higher due to their additional fluid-resistant layer.
- Filtration Efficiency: FFP3 masks, offering 99%+ protection, are typically more expensive than FFP2 masks.
- Intended Use: Masks designed for clinical settings or with higher certifications are often priced higher due to stricter manufacturing standards.
- Filter Material: Thicker filter materials, such as those on the 9330+, can also contribute to higher costs.
Conclusion
The 3M Aura range offers high-quality masks to suit various needs, from everyday use to high-risk clinical environments. Whether you need maximum protection with FFP3 masks or moderate protection with FFP2 options, understanding the features of each model will help you make the best choice.
Explore our full range of 3M Aura masks and choose the one that fits your needs best:
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. We’re here to help you stay protected!
